In re Litwin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Litwin

572 A.2d 598, 118 N.J. 466, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1425

DecidedFebruary 21, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 572 A.2d 598 (In re Litwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Litwin, 572 A.2d 598, 118 N.J. 466, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1425 (N.J. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court recommending that DAVID S. LITWIN of RICHMOND, VERMONT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, be restored to the practice of law, conditioned on the requirement that he submit proof of satisfactory completion of the Skills and Methods courses given by the Institute for Continuing Legal Education, and DAVID S. LITWIN having requested that he be reinstated to ineligible status, with the further condition that should he apply for eligible status, that his reinstatement to eligible status be conditioned on his submission of proof of satisfactory completion of the Skills and Methods courses, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID S. LITWIN is restored to the practice of law, ineligible status only, with the further condition that should He apply for reinstatement to eligible status, that his reinstatement be conditioned on his submission of proof of satisfactory completion of the Skills and Methods courses.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Supreme Court recommending that DAVID S. LITWIN of RICHMOND, VERMONT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1968, be restored to the practice of law, conditioned on the requirement that he submit proof of satisfactory completion of the Skills and Methods courses given by the Institute for Continuing Legal Education, and DAVID S. LITWIN having requested that he be reinstated to ineligible status, with the further condition that should he apply for eligible status, that his reinstatement to eligible status be conditioned on his submission of proof of satisfactory completion of the Skills and Methods courses, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that DAVID S. LITWIN is restored to the practice of law, ineligible status only, with the further condition that should He apply for reinstatement to eligible status, that his reinstatement be conditioned on his submission of proof of satisfactory completion of the Skills and Methods courses.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 A.2d 598, 118 N.J. 466, 1990 N.J. LEXIS 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-litwin-nj-1990.