in Re Lisa Luxenburg

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 13, 2014·No. 14-13-01050-CV·Published

Opinion

Reinstated and Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 13, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-01050-CV

IN RE LISA LUXENBURG, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 334th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2013-29603

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 22, 2013, relator Lisa Luxenburg filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Ken Wise, the former presiding judge of the 334th District Court of Harris County, to set aside his October 7, 2013 order granting the motion to abate the proceeding and compel arbitration filed by real party in interest J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. Judge Wise, however, is no longer presiding judge of the 334th District Court because he is now serving as a justice on this Court. Therefore, Judge Wise’s successor, the Honorable Grant Dorfman, is now the respondent. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(a). We abated this original proceeding to allow Judge Dorfman to reconsider the October 7, 2013 order. See id. 7.2(b). Judge Dorfman has reconsidered the original decision and has signed an order granting J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc.’s motion to abate the proceeding and compel arbitration.

After considering the merits of relator’s petition, we conclude that relator has not established her entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jamison.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Lisa Luxenburg, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

in Re Lisa Luxenburg (in Re Lisa Luxenburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.