In re Liquidation of Union Indemnity Ins.

607 N.E.2d 811, 80 N.Y.2d 983, 592 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 3909
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 18, 1992·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Justice Ira Gammerman at Supreme Court, New York County (148 Misc 2d 863), except insofar as it discusses the superseding legislation and the reasons for its enactment.

[986] Concur: Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Ti-tone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Liquidation of Union Indemnity Ins., 607 N.E.2d 811, 80 N.Y.2d 983, 592 N.Y.S.2d 664, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 3909 (N.Y. 1992).

607 N.E.2d 811 (In re Liquidation of Union Indemnity Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Liquidation of Union Indemnity Insurance
699 N.E.2d 852 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
In re the Liquidatioin of Union Indemnity Insurance
234 A.D.2d 70 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Board of Education v. Christa Construction, Inc.
608 N.E.2d 756 (New York Court of Appeals, 1993)