In re Liptak

84 A.3d 261, 217 N.J. 18, 2014 WL 645439, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 38
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 12, 2014·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13-154, concluding that CHRISTINE LIPTAK of MEBANE, NORTH CAROLINA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(d) and R. 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHRISTINE LIPTAK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Liptak, 84 A.3d 261, 217 N.J. 18, 2014 WL 645439, 2014 N.J. LEXIS 38 (N.J. 2014).

84 A.3d 261 (In re Liptak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related