In re Liptak

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Liptak

124 So. 3d 1106, 2013 WL 6017506, 2013 La. LEXIS 2561

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 1, 2013·No. No. 2013-OB-2131·Published

Opinion

In re Disciplinary Counsel; — Other; Applying For Findings and Recommendations (Reinstatement) Office of Disciplinary Board, No. ll-DB-103.

Petition for reinstatement denied. Petitioner may not reapply for reinstatement until he has' fully complied with all conditions set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24, including, but not limited to, the requirement that he demonstrate one year of sobriety, and in no event less than one year from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Disciplinary Counsel; — Other; Applying For Findings and Recommendations (Reinstatement) Office of Disciplinary Board, No. ll-DB-103.

Petition for reinstatement denied. Petitioner may not reapply for reinstatement until he has' fully complied with all conditions set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24, including, but not limited to, the requirement that he demonstrate one year of sobriety, and in no event less than one year from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(1).

In re Liptak, 124 So. 3d 1106, 2013 WL 6017506, 2013 La. LEXIS 2561 (La. 2013).

Pincite

124 So. 3d 1106 (In re Liptak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.