In re Liptak

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Liptak

124 So. 3d 1106, 2013 WL 6017506, 2013 La. LEXIS 2561

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 1, 2013

DocketNo. 2013-OB-2131

StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 3d 1106 (In re Liptak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Liptak, 124 So. 3d 1106, 2013 WL 6017506, 2013 La. LEXIS 2561 (La. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Disciplinary Counsel; — Other; Applying For Findings and Recommendations (Reinstatement) Office of Disciplinary Board, No. ll-DB-103.

Petition for reinstatement denied. Petitioner may not reapply for reinstatement until he has' fully complied with all conditions set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24, including, but not limited to, the requirement that he demonstrate one year of sobriety, and in no event less than one year from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Disciplinary Counsel; — Other; Applying For Findings and Recommendations (Reinstatement) Office of Disciplinary Board, No. ll-DB-103.

Petition for reinstatement denied. Petitioner may not reapply for reinstatement until he has' fully complied with all conditions set forth in Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24, including, but not limited to, the requirement that he demonstrate one year of sobriety, and in no event less than one year from the date of this judgment. Supreme Court Rule XIX, Section 24(1).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 So. 3d 1106, 2013 WL 6017506, 2013 La. LEXIS 2561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-liptak-la-2013.