In Re Liptak

982 So. 2d 821, 2008 WL 2220635
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 30, 2008
Docket2008-B-0848
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 982 So. 2d 821 (In Re Liptak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Liptak, 982 So. 2d 821, 2008 WL 2220635 (La. 2008).

Opinion

982 So.2d 821 (2008)

In re Robert A. LIPTAK.

No. 2008-B-0848.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 30, 2008.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent entered a guilty plea to an offense involving possession of a controlled substance. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Robert A. Liptak, Louisiana Bar Roll number 17696, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day, to commence from the finality of judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Smith
982 So. 2d 821 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
982 So. 2d 821, 2008 WL 2220635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-liptak-la-2008.