In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit v.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 2017
Docket14-4202
StatusPublished

This text of In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit v. (In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit v., (3d Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______

Nos. 14-4202, 14-4203, 14-4204, 14-4205, 14-4206, 14-4602 & 14-4632 ______

IN RE: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Rite Aid Corporation; Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corporation; JC (PJC) USA, LLC; Maxi Drug, Inc. d/b/a Brooks Pharmacy; Eckerd Corporation, Appellants in No. 14-4202

Walgreen Company; The Kroger Co.; Safeway, Inc.; Supervalu, Inc.; HEB Grocery Company L.P., Appellants in No. 14-4203

Giant Eagle, Inc., Appellant in No. 14-4204

Meijer, Inc.; Meijer Distribution, Inc., Appellants in No. 14-4205

Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.; Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a SAJ Distributors; Burlington Drug Company, Inc.; Value Drug Company; Professional Drug Company, Inc.; American Sales Company LLC, Appellants in No. 14-4206 A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan; Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Maryland; New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union’s and Employers’ Health and Welfare Trust Fund; Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company, d/b/a Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Louisiana; Bakers Local 433 Health Fund; Twin Cities Bakery Workers Health and Welfare Fund; Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98; New York Hotel Trades Counsel & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc., Health Benefits Fund; Edward Czarnecki; Emilie Heinle; Frank Palter; Andrew Livezey; Edward Ellenson; Jean Ellyne Dougan; Nancy Billington, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants in No. 14-4602

RP Healthcare, Inc.; Chimes Pharmacy, Inc.; James Clayworth, R.Ph., d/b/a Clayworth Pharmacy; Marin Apothecaries, Inc., d/b/a Ross Valley Pharmacy; Golden Gate Pharmacy Services, Inc., d/b/a Golden Gate Pharmacy; Pediatric Care Pharmacy, Inc.; Meyers Pharmacy, Inc.; Tony Mavrantonis R. Ph., d/b/a Jack’s Drugs; Tilley Apothecaries Inc., d/b/a Zweber’s Apothecary, Appellants in No. 14-4632

2 ______

Nos. 15-1184, 15-1185, 15-1186, 15-1187, 15-1274, 15-1323 & 15-1342 ______

IN RE: EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Walgreen, Co.; The Kroger, Co.; Safeway, Inc.; Supervalu, Inc.; HEB Grocery Company LP; American Sales Company, Inc., Appellants in No. 15-1184

Rite Aid Corporation; Rite Aid Hdqtrs., Corporation; JCG (PJC) USA, LLC; Maxi Drug, Inc. d/b/a Brooks Pharmacy; Eckerd Corporation; CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants in No. 15-1185

Giant Eagle, Inc., Appellant in No. 15-1186

Meijer, Inc.; Meijer Distribution, Inc., Appellants in No. 15-1187

Professional Drug Company, Inc.; Rochester Drug Co- Operative, Inc.; Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc.; Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a SAJ Distributors; Uniondale Chemist, Inc., Appellants in No. 15-1274

3 Painters District Council No. 30 Health & Welfare Fund; Medical Mutual of Ohio, Appellants in No. 15-1323

A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan; Daryl Deino; IBEW-NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan; Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Louisiana; Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund; MC-UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan; New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union’s and Employers’ Health and Welfare Trust Fund; Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 572 Health and Welfare Fund; Sergeants Benevolent Association Health and Welfare Fund; Patricia Sutter (together “End-Payor Class Plaintiffs”) on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants in No. 15-1342 ______

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

(MDL 2332) / (D.N.J. No. 3-12-cv-02389) / (D.N.J. No. 3- 12-cv-02478) / (D.N.J. No. 3-12-cv-02519) / (D.N.J. No. 3- 12-cv-04115) / (D.N.J. No. 3-12-cv-04537) / (D.N.J. No. 3- 12-cv-05129) / (D.N.J. No. 3-12-cv-06774) / (D.N.J. No. 3- 12-cv-07561) (D.N.J. No. 3-11-cv-05479) / (D.N.J. No. 3-11-cv-05590) / (D.N.J. No. 3-11-cv-05661) / (D.N.J. No. 3-11-cv-06985) / (D.N.J. No. 3-11-cv-07504) / (D.N.J. No. 3-12-cv-03116) / (D.N.J. No. 3-12-cv-03523) ______

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

4 ______

At the direction of the Court, the opinion filed on April 13, 2017 is amended as follows:

Page 21, first full paragraph, third line: is changed to .

Page 21, first full paragraph, ninth line: delete before .

Page 25, only full paragraph, second line: <'983 Patent> is changed to <'893 Patent>.

Page 28, fourth paragraph, fourth line: is changed to .

Page 31, second paragraph, fourth line: is changed to .

Page 43, first full paragraph, first line: is changed to .

5 Page 43, first full paragraph, tenth line: <(per curiam)> is added after .

Page 44, first full paragraph, first line: is changed to .

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Date: April 19, 2017

mlr/cc: all counsel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re DDAVP Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
585 F.3d 677 (Second Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit v., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lipitor-antitrust-lit-v-ca3-2017.