In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit v.
This text of In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit v. (In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit v.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______
Nos. 14-4202, 14-4203, 14-4204, 14-4205, 14-4206, 14-4602 & 14-4632 ______
IN RE: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Rite Aid Corporation; Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corporation; JC (PJC) USA, LLC; Maxi Drug, Inc. d/b/a Brooks Pharmacy; Eckerd Corporation, Appellants in No. 14-4202
Walgreen Company; The Kroger Co.; Safeway, Inc.; Supervalu, Inc.; HEB Grocery Company L.P., Appellants in No. 14-4203
Giant Eagle, Inc., Appellant in No. 14-4204
Meijer, Inc.; Meijer Distribution, Inc., Appellants in No. 14-4205
Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc.; Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a SAJ Distributors; Burlington Drug Company, Inc.; Value Drug Company; Professional Drug Company, Inc.; American Sales Company LLC, Appellants in No. 14-4206 A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan; Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Maryland; New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union’s and Employers’ Health and Welfare Trust Fund; Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company, d/b/a Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Louisiana; Bakers Local 433 Health Fund; Twin Cities Bakery Workers Health and Welfare Fund; Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund; International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 98; New York Hotel Trades Counsel & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc., Health Benefits Fund; Edward Czarnecki; Emilie Heinle; Frank Palter; Andrew Livezey; Edward Ellenson; Jean Ellyne Dougan; Nancy Billington, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants in No. 14-4602
RP Healthcare, Inc.; Chimes Pharmacy, Inc.; James Clayworth, R.Ph., d/b/a Clayworth Pharmacy; Marin Apothecaries, Inc., d/b/a Ross Valley Pharmacy; Golden Gate Pharmacy Services, Inc., d/b/a Golden Gate Pharmacy; Pediatric Care Pharmacy, Inc.; Meyers Pharmacy, Inc.; Tony Mavrantonis R. Ph., d/b/a Jack’s Drugs; Tilley Apothecaries Inc., d/b/a Zweber’s Apothecary, Appellants in No. 14-4632
2 ______
Nos. 15-1184, 15-1185, 15-1186, 15-1187, 15-1274, 15-1323 & 15-1342 ______
IN RE: EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Walgreen, Co.; The Kroger, Co.; Safeway, Inc.; Supervalu, Inc.; HEB Grocery Company LP; American Sales Company, Inc., Appellants in No. 15-1184
Rite Aid Corporation; Rite Aid Hdqtrs., Corporation; JCG (PJC) USA, LLC; Maxi Drug, Inc. d/b/a Brooks Pharmacy; Eckerd Corporation; CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants in No. 15-1185
Giant Eagle, Inc., Appellant in No. 15-1186
Meijer, Inc.; Meijer Distribution, Inc., Appellants in No. 15-1187
Professional Drug Company, Inc.; Rochester Drug Co- Operative, Inc.; Stephen L. LaFrance Holdings, Inc.; Stephen L. LaFrance Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a SAJ Distributors; Uniondale Chemist, Inc., Appellants in No. 15-1274
3 Painters District Council No. 30 Health & Welfare Fund; Medical Mutual of Ohio, Appellants in No. 15-1323
A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan; Daryl Deino; IBEW-NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan; Louisiana Health Service Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Louisiana; Man-U Service Contract Trust Fund; MC-UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan; New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union’s and Employers’ Health and Welfare Trust Fund; Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 572 Health and Welfare Fund; Sergeants Benevolent Association Health and Welfare Fund; Patricia Sutter (together “End-Payor Class Plaintiffs”) on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Appellants in No. 15-1342 ______
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
(MDL 2332) / (D.N.J. No. 3-12-cv-02389) / (D.N.J. No. 3- 12-cv-02478) / (D.N.J. No. 3-12-cv-02519) / (D.N.J. No. 3- 12-cv-04115) / (D.N.J. No. 3-12-cv-04537) / (D.N.J. No. 3- 12-cv-05129) / (D.N.J. No. 3-12-cv-06774) / (D.N.J. No. 3- 12-cv-07561) (D.N.J. No. 3-11-cv-05479) / (D.N.J. No. 3-11-cv-05590) / (D.N.J. No. 3-11-cv-05661) / (D.N.J. No. 3-11-cv-06985) / (D.N.J. No. 3-11-cv-07504) / (D.N.J. No. 3-12-cv-03116) / (D.N.J. No. 3-12-cv-03523) ______
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
4 ______
At the direction of the Court, the opinion filed on April 13, 2017 is amended as follows:
Page 21, first full paragraph, third line:
Page 21, first full paragraph, ninth line: delete
Page 25, only full paragraph, second line: <'983 Patent> is changed to <'893 Patent>.
Page 28, fourth paragraph, fourth line:
Page 31, second paragraph, fourth line:
Page 43, first full paragraph, first line:
5 Page 43, first full paragraph, tenth line: <(per curiam)> is added after
Page 44, first full paragraph, first line:
For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk Date: April 19, 2017
mlr/cc: all counsel
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Lipitor Antitrust Lit v., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lipitor-antitrust-lit-v-ca3-2017.