In re Lipinski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Lipinski

33 A.D.2d 689, 307 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2900

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 689 (In re Lipinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lipinski, 33 A.D.2d 689, 307 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2900 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal (by permission of this court) from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated January 31, 1969 (sub norn. People v. Lipinski), in a proceeding under section 210 of the Mental Hygiene Law for civil certification of petitioner, as a narcotic addict, to respondent’s care and custody. Prior to the proceeding petitioner had been charged with a misdemeanor and, upon a medical examination under section 207 of the Mental Hygiene Law, had been certified by the examining physician as such addict. The order of the Appellate Term dismissed petitioner’s appeal to that court from an order of the District Court, Nassau County, entered November 15, 1967, certifying him as a narcotic addict to respondent’s care and custody. Appeal dismissed, without costs. In view of the fact that the District Court’s order of certification has recently been vacated by an order of the Supreme Court, Sullivan County, dated October 3, 1968, in a habeas corpus proceeding (People ex rel. Lipinski v. Morrow), the issues raised herein have become moot. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal (by permission of this court) from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated January 31, 1969 (sub norn. People v. Lipinski), in a proceeding under section 210 of the Mental Hygiene Law for civil certification of petitioner, as a narcotic addict, to respondent’s care and custody. Prior to the proceeding petitioner had been charged with a misdemeanor and, upon a medical examination under section 207 of the Mental Hygiene Law, had been certified by the examining physician as such addict. The order of the Appellate Term dismissed petitioner’s appeal to that court from an order of the District Court, Nassau County, entered November 15, 1967, certifying him as a narcotic addict to respondent’s care and custody. Appeal dismissed, without costs. In view of the fact that the District Court’s order of certification has recently been vacated by an order of the Supreme Court, Sullivan County, dated October 3, 1968, in a habeas corpus proceeding (People ex rel. Lipinski v. Morrow), the issues raised herein have become moot. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 689, 307 N.Y.S.2d 417, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lipinski-nyappdiv-1969.