In Re Lipari

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In Re Lipari

32 A.2d 838, 130 N.J.L. 346, 1943 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 107

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 12, 1943·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to No. 213, In re Application of Leo Rosenblum, 130 N. J. L. 344. Relator herein was sergeant-at-arms of the Eourth Criminal Judicial District Court of Hudson County and seeks the payment of his salary from June 1st to December 15th, 1942.

His claim for the period from June 1st to June 24th, 1942, is sustained by the case of Reppucci v. Board of Chosen Free holders, 130 N. J. L. 22; 31 Atl. Rep. (2d) 215. As to his claim for the period subsequent to June 24th, the holding in the Rosenblum case is controlling.

. The writ is allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a companion case to No. 213, In re Application of Leo Rosenblum, 130 N. J. L. 344. Relator herein was sergeant-at-arms of the Eourth Criminal Judicial District Court of Hudson County and seeks the payment of his salary from June 1st to December 15th, 1942.

His claim for the period from June 1st to June 24th, 1942, is sustained by the case of Reppucci v. Board of Chosen Free holders, 130 N. J. L. 22; 31 Atl. Rep. (2d) 215. As to his claim for the period subsequent to June 24th, the holding in the Rosenblum case is controlling.

. The writ is allowed.

In Re Lipari, 32 A.2d 838, 130 N.J.L. 346, 1943 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 107 (N.J. 1943).

Pincite

32 A.2d 838 (In Re Lipari) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.