In re Linn

183 A.D.2d 399, 592 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13579
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 7, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 183 A.D.2d 399 (In re Linn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Linn, 183 A.D.2d 399, 592 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

On June 26, 1992, the respondent was convicted in the County Court, Westchester County, upon his plea of guilty, of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.40, a class C felony.

Pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4), the respondent ceased to be an attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony.

[400]*400Accordingly, the petitioner’s motion is granted. The respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately.

Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Michael S. Linn, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall comply with this Court’s rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Michael S. Linn, is commanded to desist and refrain (1) from practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Linn
280 A.D.2d 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 A.D.2d 399, 592 N.Y.S.2d 597, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-linn-nyappdiv-1992.