In re Lindenauer

41 A.D.2d 400, 343 N.Y.S.2d 778, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4468
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the First Department, on April 11, 1932.

Ón January 26,1973 respondent was convicted in the Supreme Court, New York County, of the crimes of bribery (Penal Law, § 200.00) and bribing a witness (Penal Law, § 215.00).

Petitioner, the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, by this petition, seeks to have respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys. Such action is mandatory (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd. 4; Matter of Konigsberg, 39 A D 2d 10).

The petition should be granted and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys.

Nunez, J. P., Kupeerman, Murphy, Steuer and Capozzoli, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law of the State of New York.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Lindenauer, 41 A.D.2d 400, 343 N.Y.S.2d 778, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

41 A.D.2d 400 (In re Lindenauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Glasser
53 A.D.2d 38 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)