In Re: Linda Marie Rutherford v. E. Lynn Schoenmann

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 19, 2023
Docket21-60059
StatusUnpublished

This text of In Re: Linda Marie Rutherford v. E. Lynn Schoenmann (In Re: Linda Marie Rutherford v. E. Lynn Schoenmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Linda Marie Rutherford v. E. Lynn Schoenmann, (9th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 19 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: LINDA MARIE RUTHERFORD, No. 21-60059

Debtor, BAP No. 21-1074

------------------------------ MEMORANDUM* JOANNIE TANG-FOK,

Appellant,

v.

E. LYNN SCHOENMANN, Chapter 7 Trustee; LINDA MARIE RUTHERFORD,

Appellees.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Gan, Taylor, and Brand, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted May 16, 2023**

Before: BENNETT, MILLER, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Joannie Tang-Fok appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting Linda Marie

Rutherford, a Chapter 7 debtor, discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo a decision of the BAP,

and we review the underlying bankruptcy court decision applying the same

standard of review the BAP did. In re Hutchinson, 15 F.4th 1229, 1232 (9th Cir.

2021). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court properly granted a discharge to Rutherford because

Tang-Fok failed to file a complaint objecting to the discharge of Rutherford’s debt

or seeking to except specific debt from discharge. See Kontrick v. Ryan, 540 U.S.

443, 448 n.3 (2004) (noting that time restrictions to file a complaint objecting to

discharge of any debt under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a) or particular debts under 11 U.S.C.

§ 523(c) are “practical[ly] identi[cal]”); In re Kennerley, 995 F.2d 145, 146 (9th

Cir. 1993) (explaining that bankruptcy rules impose strict time limits for filing

complaints to determine dischargeability of debts).

AFFIRMED.

2 21-60059

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Linda Marie Rutherford v. E. Lynn Schoenmann, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-linda-marie-rutherford-v-e-lynn-schoenmann-ca9-2023.