In re Lifetrade Litigation

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED; 6/7/2023 +--+ +--+ ----X IN RE LIFETRADE LITIGATION: ORDER 17-CV-2987 (JPO)(KHP)

+--+ ----X KATHARINE H. PARKER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Wells Fargo Defendant has objected to the public filing of Exhibit A to ECF No. 1070 because it is a rough draft of a deposition transcript that Defendant has not had an opportunity to review for confidentiality designations or sign. After review, the Court is satisfied that sealing the exhibit is proper under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Given the nature of the document as a rough draft and the contents of the letter motion, the public presumption of access is lower than the parties’ interest in reviewing the deposition transcript prior to public disclosure. The Clerk of the Court is directed to seal the exhibit at ECF No. 1070-1. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 7, 2023 New York, New York ee bthain H fete KATHARINE H. PARKER United States Magistrate Judge