In re Liebman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Liebman

93 A.D.2d 720, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17552

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 7, 1983·Published

Opinion

—• Respondent directed to show cause, as indicated in the order of this court, why a final order of suspension, censure or removal from office should not be made and, pending final determination of the petition respondent is suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York effective immediately and until the further order of this court. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Asch, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—• Respondent directed to show cause, as indicated in the order of this court, why a final order of suspension, censure or removal from office should not be made and, pending final determination of the petition respondent is suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York effective immediately and until the further order of this court. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Asch, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.

In re Liebman, 93 A.D.2d 720, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

93 A.D.2d 720 (In re Liebman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.