In re Liddy
This text of 41 A.D.2d 422 (In re Liddy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Respondent was admitted to the Bar in the First Department on December 9, 1957.
On March 23, 1973 respondent was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia of several crimes including burglary in the second degree.
This crime is a felony in the District of Columbia (D. C. Code, § 22-1801; U. S. Code, tit. 18, § 1) and is cognizable as a felony in New York (Penal Law §§ 140.20, 140.25, 140.30).
Petitioner, the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, seeks to have respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys. This action is mandatory (Judiciary Law, § 90, subd. 4; Matter of Jonas, 26 A D 2d 87).
The letter of resignation, admitting to conviction of a felony, dated April 27, 1973, to be effective March 23, 1973, cannot be accepted since, upon conviction, disbarment is automatic and effective immediately (Matter of Ginsberg, 1 N Y 2d 144). We have found the other contentions raised to be without merit.
The petition should be granted and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys.
Stevens, P. J., Nunez, Kupfbbman, Murphy and Lane, JJ., concur.
Petition granted and respondent’s name struck from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York and cross motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 A.D.2d 422, 343 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-liddy-nyappdiv-1973.