In re Lichtenberg

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Lichtenberg

657 A.2d 168, 161 Vt. 614, 1993 Vt. LEXIS 134

Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided December 7, 1993·No. No. 93-430·Published

Opinion

The recommended sanction is not approved. The violations found warrant a six-month suspension, and respondent Andrew Lichtenberg is suspended from the practice of law for six months, commencing on January 1, 1994. In addition, the respondent shall also be placed on probation for a term of one year, commencing on July 1,1994. During that term of probation, respondent shall retake the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) and achieve a passing grade under the prevailing Vermont standards.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The recommended sanction is not approved. The violations found warrant a six-month suspension, and respondent Andrew Lichtenberg is suspended from the practice of law for six months, commencing on January 1, 1994. In addition, the respondent shall also be placed on probation for a term of one year, commencing on July 1,1994. During that term of probation, respondent shall retake the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) and achieve a passing grade under the prevailing Vermont standards.

In re Lichtenberg, 657 A.2d 168, 161 Vt. 614, 1993 Vt. LEXIS 134 (Vt. 1993).

Pincite

657 A.2d 168 (In re Lichtenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.