In re Lichtenberg

Supreme Court of Vermont

In re Lichtenberg

657 A.2d 168, 161 Vt. 614, 1993 Vt. LEXIS 134

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedDecember 7, 1993

DocketNo. 93-430

StatusPublished

This text of 657 A.2d 168 (In re Lichtenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lichtenberg, 657 A.2d 168, 161 Vt. 614, 1993 Vt. LEXIS 134 (Vt. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

The recommended sanction is not approved. The violations found warrant a six-month suspension, and respondent Andrew Lichtenberg is suspended from the practice of law for six months, commencing on January 1, 1994. In addition, the respondent shall also be placed on probation for a term of one year, commencing on July 1,1994. During that term of probation, respondent shall retake the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) and achieve a passing grade under the prevailing Vermont standards.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The recommended sanction is not approved. The violations found warrant a six-month suspension, and respondent Andrew Lichtenberg is suspended from the practice of law for six months, commencing on January 1, 1994. In addition, the respondent shall also be placed on probation for a term of one year, commencing on July 1,1994. During that term of probation, respondent shall retake the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) and achieve a passing grade under the prevailing Vermont standards.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

657 A.2d 168, 161 Vt. 614, 1993 Vt. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lichtenberg-vt-1993.