in Re Liberty Brown

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 14, 2017
Docket05-17-00154-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Liberty Brown (in Re Liberty Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Liberty Brown, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Dismissed and Opinion Filed February 14, 2017

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00154-CV

IN RE LIBERTY BROWN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-16449

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill Before the Court is relator’s February 13, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus in which

relator complains of a ruling purportedly issued by the University Interscholastic League District

12-5A Executive Committee (“DEC”) on January 18, 2017 that declared relator ineligible for

varsity basketball competition at Dallas’ Bryan Adams High School. Relator asks the Court to

direct the DEC to “void” the ruling and “issue a ruling declaring” relator “immediately eligible”

to participate in varsity basketball competition at Bryan Adams High School. The Court lacks

jurisdiction to provide the relief requested.

The Court’s power to issue extraordinary writs is limited. TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(a)-

(b) (West 2004). The Court may issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county

court in our district or a district court judge acting as a magistrate at a court of inquiry in our

district under Chapter 52 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b)

(West 2004). We may issue writs of mandamus against an entity other than a judge described in section 22.221(b) only if the writ is necessary to enforce the Court’s jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T

CODE § 22.221(a) (West 2004). No appeal is pending here, and our jurisdiction is not in

jeopardy. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for want of jurisdiction.

/Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE

140154F.P05

–2–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Liberty Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-liberty-brown-texapp-2017.