In re Lewis

Utah Supreme Court

In re Lewis

41 P. 1077, 10 Utah 47, 1893 Utah LEXIS 1

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedApril 15, 1893

DocketNo. 375

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 P. 1077 (In re Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lewis, 41 P. 1077, 10 Utah 47, 1893 Utah LEXIS 1 (Utah 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Zahe, C. J.

(orally):

The court is of the opinion the justice of the peace having reached the limit of his jurisdiction in adjudging that the defendant be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of six months, had no valid authority to adjudge [54]*54that the defendant be further imprisoned in default of payment of the fine imposed and to that extent the judgment is void. It appears that the petitioner has already been imprisoned for a period of more than six months, and is consequently entitled to be discharged.

The writ is allowed and the petitioner discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zahe, C. J.

(orally):

The court is of the opinion the justice of the peace having reached the limit of his jurisdiction in adjudging that the defendant be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of six months, had no valid authority to adjudge [54]*54that the defendant be further imprisoned in default of payment of the fine imposed and to that extent the judgment is void. It appears that the petitioner has already been imprisoned for a period of more than six months, and is consequently entitled to be discharged.

The writ is allowed and the petitioner discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 P. 1077, 10 Utah 47, 1893 Utah LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lewis-utah-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack