In re Lewis

528 S.E.2d 79, 339 S.C. 6, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 40
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 9, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 528 S.E.2d 79 (In re Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Lewis, 528 S.E.2d 79, 339 S.C. 6, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 40 (S.C. 2000).

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking the appointment of an attorney to protect clients’ interests pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent consents to an interim suspension.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that George David Jebaily, Esquire, is appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating accounts(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Mr. Jebaily shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Jebaily may make disbursements [7]*7from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating accounts(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that George David Jebaily, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that George David Jebaily, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Jebail/s office.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J.

FOR THE COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Lewis
542 S.E.2d 713 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 S.E.2d 79, 339 S.C. 6, 2000 S.C. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lewis-sc-2000.