In re Lewis

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Lewis

946 N.E.2d 243, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1486

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 5, 2011·Published

Opinion

On May 11, 2005, this court found Sidney T. Lewis to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Lewis was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On April 22, 2011, Lewis submitted a motion for leave of court to file judicial notice of stipulated facts for dissemination of false advertisements. On [1487] April 29, 2011, Lewis submitted an emergency motion for leave to set aside judgment and reopen cases.

Upon review of the motions for leave, it is determined by the court that they are without merit. Accordingly, it is ordered by the court that Lewis’s motions for leave are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On May 11, 2005, this court found Sidney T. Lewis to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Lewis was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On April 22, 2011, Lewis submitted a motion for leave of court to file judicial notice of stipulated facts for dissemination of false advertisements. On [1487] April 29, 2011, Lewis submitted an emergency motion for leave to set aside judgment and reopen cases.

Upon review of the motions for leave, it is determined by the court that they are without merit. Accordingly, it is ordered by the court that Lewis’s motions for leave are denied.

In re Lewis, 946 N.E.2d 243, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1486 (Ohio 2011).

Pincite

946 N.E.2d 243 (In re Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.