In re Lewis

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Lewis

925 N.E.2d 141, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1551

DecidedApril 22, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 925 N.E.2d 141 (In re Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lewis, 925 N.E.2d 141, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1551 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In May 11, 2005, this court found Sidney T. Lewis and Yvonne D. Webb-Lewis to be vexatious litigators under S.CtPrac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Sidney T. Lewis and Yvonne D. Webb-Lewis were prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On April 6, 2010, Sidney T. Lewis and Yvonne D. Webb-Lewis submitted a motion for leave to file motions. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the motion for leave of Sidney T. Lewis and Yvonne D. Webb-Lewis is denied.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In May 11, 2005, this court found Sidney T. Lewis and Yvonne D. Webb-Lewis to be vexatious litigators under S.CtPrac.R. 14.5(B). This court further ordered that Sidney T. Lewis and Yvonne D. Webb-Lewis were prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On April 6, 2010, Sidney T. Lewis and Yvonne D. Webb-Lewis submitted a motion for leave to file motions. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the motion for leave of Sidney T. Lewis and Yvonne D. Webb-Lewis is denied.

Pfeifer, Acting C.J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

925 N.E.2d 141, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lewis-ohio-2010.