In re Lewis

The Superior Court of New York City

In re Lewis

16 Jones & S. 536

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided April 3, 1882·Published

Opinion

The court at G-eneral Term, said : “If the power to entertain proceedings of this character in a summary manner exists at all, it should be exercised in such exceptional cases only as are free from doubt as to consequences. The case at bar falls within the principle of the Hatch case (43 Super: Ct. 94), and should be controlled by the decision of that case.”

Opinion by Freedman, J.; Russell, J., concurred.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The court at G-eneral Term, said : “If the power to entertain proceedings of this character in a summary manner exists at all, it should be exercised in such exceptional cases only as are free from doubt as to consequences. The case at bar falls within the principle of the Hatch case (43 Super: Ct. 94), and should be controlled by the decision of that case.”

Opinion by Freedman, J.; Russell, J., concurred.

Order affirmed, with costs.

In re Lewis, 16 Jones & S. 536 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).

Pincite

16 Jones & S. 536 (In re Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.