In re Lewis
Opinion
The respondents, knowing that certain bonds had been stolen, acted as intermediaries in a sale thereof to the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, which had insured the owner and paid the loss. They devised a plan whereby the bonds were delivered in installments upon payment of an agreed price, receiving in exchange for bonds having a market value of approximately $110,000 the sum of $42,000. Of this amount the respondents concededly divided between themselves at least [282]*282$10,000. They further gave a gratuity to a representative of the Fidelity Company with whom they consummated the sale by paying to him the sum of $2,000.
The respondents should be disbarred.
Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
In Lewis proceeding: Respondent disbarred.
In Lichtman proceeding: Respondent disbarred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
252 A.D. 281 (In re Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.