In re Lewis

252 A.D. 281, 299 N.Y.S. 168, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5635

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondents, knowing that certain bonds had been stolen, acted as intermediaries in a sale thereof to the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, which had insured the owner and paid the loss. They devised a plan whereby the bonds were delivered in installments upon payment of an agreed price, receiving in exchange for bonds having a market value of approximately $110,000 the sum of $42,000. Of this amount the respondents concededly divided between themselves at least [282]*282$10,000. They further gave a gratuity to a representative of the Fidelity Company with whom they consummated the sale by paying to him the sum of $2,000.

The respondents should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

In Lewis proceeding: Respondent disbarred.

In Lichtman proceeding: Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Lewis, 252 A.D. 281, 299 N.Y.S. 168, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

252 A.D. 281 (In re Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.