In re Lewis N.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Lewis N.

41 A.D.2d 774, 341 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4849

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.2d 774 (In re Lewis N.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lewis N., 41 A.D.2d 774, 341 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4849 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated November 6, 1972, which (1) adjudged appellant to be a juvenile delinquent in that he had committed an act which would, if committed by an adult, have constituted, inter alla, possession of stolen property and (2) placed him in the New York State Training School for a period not to exceed 18 months. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting therefrom the adjudication that the act in question would also have constituted grand larceny and unlawful use of a vehicl.e. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the adjudication with respect to.possession of stolen property was justified by the proof, but the trial court should not also have made the guilty adjudication with reference to grand larceny and unlawful use of a vehicle. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated November 6, 1972, which (1) adjudged appellant to be a juvenile delinquent in that he had committed an act which would, if committed by an adult, have constituted, inter alla, possession of stolen property and (2) placed him in the New York State Training School for a period not to exceed 18 months. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting therefrom the adjudication that the act in question would also have constituted grand larceny and unlawful use of a vehicl.e. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the adjudication with respect to.possession of stolen property was justified by the proof, but the trial court should not also have made the guilty adjudication with reference to grand larceny and unlawful use of a vehicle. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 774, 341 N.Y.S.2d 871, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lewis-n-nyappdiv-1973.