In re Lewis

Fourth Circuit

In re Lewis

471 F. App'x 209

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2012·No. No. 12-1040·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Harrison Lewis, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his civil suit. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court dismissed his suit on February 27, 2012, 2012 WL 628800. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Lewis’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Harrison Lewis, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his civil suit. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court dismissed his suit on February 27, 2012, 2012 WL 628800. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Lewis’ case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Lewis, 471 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

471 F. App'x 209 (In re Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.