In re Levy

15 F. Cas. 433, 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 184, 1867 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Levy. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 F. Cas. 427
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 7, 1867·Published

Opinion

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

In consequence of embarrassments similar to that certified in this ease, the 27th rule has been vacated, leaving any case in which any ground of complaint exists against an as-signee on account of any matter connected with his employment of an attorney or solicitor, to be brought before the court for its action.

The clerk will certify this decision to the register, Isaiah T. Williams. Esq.

[This case was subsequently heard upon the question as to whether a creditor who has not filed his claim may object to the bankrupt’s discharge. Case No. 8,297.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Levy, 15 F. Cas. 433, 1 Nat. Bank. Reg. 184, 1867 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141 (S.D.N.Y. 1867).

15 F. Cas. 433 (In re Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.