In re Levin

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Levin

65 A.3d 255, 213 N.J. 524, 2013 WL 2247779, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 449

DecidedMay 22, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.3d 255 (In re Levin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Levin, 65 A.3d 255, 213 N.J. 524, 2013 WL 2247779, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 449 (N.J. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-190, concluding that HARRY J. LEVIN of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be censured for violating RPC 1.4(b)(failure to keep a client [525]*525reasonably informed about the status of a matter), RPC 1.5(b) (failure to set forth in writing the basis or rate of the fee), former RPC 1.7(a)(1) and (b) (conflict of interest), former RPC 1.8(a)(im-proper business transaction with a client), RPC 3.3(a)(1) (false statement of material fact to a tribunal), and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HARRY J. LEVIN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative cost and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 3:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 12-190, concluding that HARRY J. LEVIN of TOMS RIVER, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be censured for violating RPC 1.4(b)(failure to keep a client [525]*525reasonably informed about the status of a matter), RPC 1.5(b) (failure to set forth in writing the basis or rate of the fee), former RPC 1.7(a)(1) and (b) (conflict of interest), former RPC 1.8(a)(im-proper business transaction with a client), RPC 3.3(a)(1) (false statement of material fact to a tribunal), and RPC 8.4(c)(conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HARRY J. LEVIN is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative cost and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 3:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.3d 255, 213 N.J. 524, 2013 WL 2247779, 2013 N.J. LEXIS 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-levin-nj-2013.