In Re Levan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In Re Levan

4 A.2d 280, 125 N.J. Eq. 92, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 631

DecidedFebruary 6, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 4 A.2d 280 (In Re Levan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Levan, 4 A.2d 280, 125 N.J. Eq. 92, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 631 (N.J. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

We have examined and considered with care the evidence and stipulation exhibited by the state of the case herein, in the light of the arguments of counsel, and we conclude that the decree of the prerogative court, advised by Vice-Ordinary Berry, is fully justified, and such decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None. *Page 93

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We have examined and considered with care the evidence and stipulation exhibited by the state of the case herein, in the light of the arguments of counsel, and we conclude that the decree of the prerogative court, advised by Vice-Ordinary Berry, is fully justified, and such decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None. *Page 93

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 A.2d 280, 125 N.J. Eq. 92, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-levan-nj-1939.