In Re Levan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In Re Levan

4 A.2d 280, 125 N.J. Eq. 92, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 631

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 6, 1939·Published

Opinion

We have examined and considered with care the evidence and stipulation exhibited by the state of the case herein, in the light of the arguments of counsel, and we conclude that the decree of the prerogative court, advised by Vice-Ordinary Berry, is fully justified, and such decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None. *Page 93

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We have examined and considered with care the evidence and stipulation exhibited by the state of the case herein, in the light of the arguments of counsel, and we conclude that the decree of the prerogative court, advised by Vice-Ordinary Berry, is fully justified, and such decree will be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None. *Page 93

In Re Levan, 4 A.2d 280, 125 N.J. Eq. 92, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 631 (N.J. 1939).

Pincite

4 A.2d 280 (In Re Levan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.