In Re Letcher

79 P. 65, 145 Cal. 563, 1904 Cal. LEXIS 630
California Supreme Court·Decided December 19, 1904·No. Crim. No. 1216.·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

The indictment charges a public offense within the statute of the state of Ohio. The regularity of the proceedings had in that state before extradition is not reviewable by us in this proceeding.

Upon the proposition as to whether or not the petitioner is a fugitive from justice within the meaning of the constitution of the United States, that question seems to be absolutely decided against petitioner's contention by the supreme court of the United States in Roberts v. Reilly, 116 U.S. 80, and the decision of that court upon this constitutional question is absolutely binding upon this tribunal. Whether or not the facts in the case of petitioner are such as to call for a modification of the views expressed in Roberts v. Reilly is a question which can only be decided by the federal courts, whose writs and processes are open to petitioner.

The petitioner is remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Letcher, 79 P. 65, 145 Cal. 563, 1904 Cal. LEXIS 630 (Cal. 1904).

79 P. 65 (In Re Letcher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Gilchrist
134 Cal. App. 3d 867 (California Court of Appeal, 1982)
In Re Cooper
349 P.2d 956 (California Supreme Court, 1960)
Masaoka v. People
245 P.2d 1062 (California Supreme Court, 1952)
In Re Brewer
143 P.2d 33 (California Court of Appeal, 1943)
Grogan v. Welch
227 N.W. 74 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1929)
Town of Mayesville v. Clamp
147 S.E. 455 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1929)