In re Lester

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Lester

882 So. 2d 546, 2004 La. LEXIS 2659, 2004 WL 2128668

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 22, 2004·No. No. 2004-B-0396·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Considering the recommendation of the hearing committee in this matter,

IT IS ORDERED that the hearing committee’s recommendation shall be accepted and the ODC’s motion for interim suspension be and hereby is denied. The ODC has not produced sufficient evidence demonstrating that respondent presently poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the public, as required by Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.2.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges, and/or the institution of new formal charges, as appropriate.

/s/ Catherine D. Kimball Justice, Supreme court of Louisiana

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Considering the recommendation of the hearing committee in this matter,

IT IS ORDERED that the hearing committee’s recommendation shall be accepted and the ODC’s motion for interim suspension be and hereby is denied. The ODC has not produced sufficient evidence demonstrating that respondent presently poses a substantial threat of serious harm to the public, as required by Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 19.2.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded for consideration of the previously filed formal charges, and/or the institution of new formal charges, as appropriate.

/s/ Catherine D. Kimball Justice, Supreme court of Louisiana

In re Lester, 882 So. 2d 546, 2004 La. LEXIS 2659, 2004 WL 2128668 (La. 2004).

Pincite

882 So. 2d 546 (In re Lester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.