In re Lerczak
This text of 156 A.D.2d 882 (In re Lerczak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 10, 1987, which assessed the employer for additional unemployment insurance contributions.
Rosalind Lerczak, doing business as June II Model Agency (hereinafter the Agency), operates a modeling agency which she purchased in 1983. During the predecessor’s ownership, the Department of Labor, following an audit, determined that the models were the Agency’s employees and not independent contractors. In the instant case the Unemployment Insurance [883]*883Appeal Board adopted the Administrative Law Judge’s finding that the Agency’s relationship to its models is substantially similar to that which existed when the predecessor owner operated the business. As that finding is essential to the Administrative Law Judge’s opinion, and it is not justified by the record, we remit the matter to the Board to enable it to set forth the facts it relied upon in arriving at its decision.
Decision withheld, and matter remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with this court’s decision. Casey, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 A.D.2d 882, 551 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lerczak-nyappdiv-1989.