In re Lequan P.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Lequan P.

265 A.D.2d 231, 696 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10652

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 231 (In re Lequan P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lequan P., 265 A.D.2d 231, 696 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about August 13, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about August 13, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s determinations concerning credibility. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 231, 696 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lequan-p-nyappdiv-1999.