In re Leppein
15 F. Cas. 353
Opinion
said, briefly, that, notwithstanding Mr. M’Call’s argument, he saw nothing to destroy the right of distress, as long as the goods remained on the premises. The assignee could not be in a better condition than a bona fide purchaser. It was accordingly ordered that Leppein should pay the rent, interest, and costs, out of the bankrupt’s estate; the value of the property levied on having been more than sufficient for that purpose.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Leppein, 15 F. Cas. 353 (E.D. Pa. 1842).
15 F. Cas. 353 (In re Leppein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.