in Re: Leopoldo Salinas
This text of in Re: Leopoldo Salinas (in Re: Leopoldo Salinas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 26, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00459-CV
IN RE LEOPOLDO SALINAS, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On May 12, 2005, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his petition, relator sought to have this court compel his court-appointed attorney to forward a copy of the State=s brief in the appeal of his criminal conviction.[1]
We lack power to issue a writ of mandamus against an attorney. Section 22.221 of the Texas Government Code gives us power to issue writs of mandamus(1) against a judge of a district or county court in our court of appeals district, or (2) to enforce the jurisdiction of our court. Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004). Relator does not seek either type of relief.
Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 26, 2005.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Frost.
[1] On April 26, 2005, this court affirmed appellant=s conviction. See Salinas v. State, No. 14-04-01208-CR, (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] April 26, 2005, pet. filed). On May 11, 2005, appellant=s court-appointed counsel filed a petition for discretionary review by the Court of Criminal Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Leopoldo Salinas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-leopoldo-salinas-texapp-2005.