In re Leopoldo C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Leopoldo C.

36 A.D.3d 503, 826 N.Y.S.2d 568

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 36 A.D.3d 503 (In re Leopoldo C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Leopoldo C., 36 A.D.3d 503, 826 N.Y.S.2d 568 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about August 9, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and obstruct[504]*504ing governmental administration in the second degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Saxe, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about August 9, 2005, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and obstruct[504]*504ing governmental administration in the second degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning identification and credibility (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Mazzarelli, Saxe, Marlow and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 A.D.3d 503, 826 N.Y.S.2d 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-leopoldo-c-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack