in Re Leopold Malachowitsch
This text of in Re Leopold Malachowitsch (in Re Leopold Malachowitsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 19, 2011.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-11-00316-CV
In Re Leopold Malachowitsch, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On April 12, 2011, relator Leopold Malachowitsch filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable William R. Burke, Jr., presiding judge of the 189th District Court of Harris County, to preserve the “status quo of the matter in litigation.”
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure require relator to include “any order complained of, or any other document showing the matter complained of[.]” See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A). Relator has not done so. Without an order or other document showing the matter complained of, this court cannot conclude the trial court abused its discretion. See In re Chonody, 49 S.W.3d 376, 378–79 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2000, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Frost, Jamison, and McCally.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Leopold Malachowitsch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-leopold-malachowitsch-texapp-2011.