in Re Leonard Shane Prudhomme
This text of in Re Leonard Shane Prudhomme (in Re Leonard Shane Prudhomme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-16-00533-CV
In re Leonard Shane Prudhomme
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Leonard Shane Prudhomme filed his petition for writ of mandamus,
challenging the trial court’s denial of his plea to the jurisdiction in a child-custody suit. See Tex. R.
App. P. 52.1. Having reviewed the petition, the record, and the response, we deny the petition for
writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.
While relator’s petition was pending, the real party in interest, Kimberly Prudhomme,
filed a Motion to Strike and for Sanctions, requesting that this Court strike documents in the
mandamus record and impose sanctions on relator. Because we deny relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus, we dismiss real party in interest’s motion to strike as moot. We further deny real party
in interest’s motion for sanctions.
__________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bourland, Justice
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Bourland
Filed: August 31, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Leonard Shane Prudhomme, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-leonard-shane-prudhomme-texapp-2016.