in Re Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle

Opinion

Opinion issued September 15, 2011.

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01-11-00694-CV

———————————

IN RE LEON SHANKLE AND MARGIE BENTON SHANKLE, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

          By petition for writ of mandamus, relators, Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle, challenge the trial court’s judgment granting the real parties in interest, Joseph Ouzenne and Ouzenne Construction Company, their bill of review, setting aside the underlying default judgment, and reinstating the case.[1] 

          We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

---

[1]           The underlying case is Leon Shankle and Margie Benton Shankle v. Paul Ouzenne, Individually, and Ouzenne Construction Company, No. 2003-13270, in the 129th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Gomez presiding.