In Re Leo Wayne Cover v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-25-00251-CR __________________
IN RE LEO WAYNE COVER
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. 23DCCR2231 and 23DCCR2232 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In a petition for a writ of mandamus, Leo Wayne Cover complains that the
trial court has not ruled on Cover’s pre-trial motions. At our request, the State filed
a response. The State also supplemented the mandamus record to provide a more
complete record for review.
On March 31, 2025, the trial court granted Cover’s request to proceed pro se
in Trial Cause Numbers 23DCCR2231 and 23DCCR2232. Since that time, Cover
has filed many motions. Both of Cover’s cases are currently set for trial on July 28,
2025. Cover requested a pre-trial hearing, but until just recently the request was filed
in the wrong court.
1 Generally, the trial court has the discretion to schedule a pre-trial hearing.
Calloway v. State, 743 S.W.2d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). Mandamus relief
may issue, however, in situations where appeal after conviction will not be an
appropriate remedy. See Stearnes v. Clinton, 780 S.W.2d 216, 225 (Tex. Crim. App.
1989) (orig. proceeding). On the record before us, Relator has not shown that the
trial court abused its discretion by failing to rule on his motions within a reasonable
time. We deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on July 21, 2025 Opinion Delivered July 30, 2025 Do Not Publish
Before Johnson, Wright and Chambers, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Leo Wayne Cover v. the State of Texas (In Re Leo Wayne Cover v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.