In re Lenoir

Supreme Court of Louisiana

In re Lenoir

253 So. 3d 1291

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 8, 2018·No. NO. 2018-B-1149·Published

Opinion

Considering the Petition for Revocation of Conditional Admission filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the consent to revocation filed by respondent,

IT IS ORDERED that respondent's conditional admission to the practice of law in the State of Louisiana be revoked, effective immediately. Respondent may not re-apply for admission until he can demonstrate at least a one-year period of sobriety and compliance with the terms and conditions of a contract with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program. Should respondent thereafter choose to submit an application for readmission, he shall comply with all requirements of Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall pay all costs associated with these proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Considering the Petition for Revocation of Conditional Admission filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, and the consent to revocation filed by respondent,

IT IS ORDERED that respondent's conditional admission to the practice of law in the State of Louisiana be revoked, effective immediately. Respondent may not re-apply for admission until he can demonstrate at least a one-year period of sobriety and compliance with the terms and conditions of a contract with the Judges and Lawyers Assistance Program. Should respondent thereafter choose to submit an application for readmission, he shall comply with all requirements of Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 24.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall pay all costs associated with these proceedings.

In re Lenoir, 253 So. 3d 1291 (La. 2018).

Pincite

253 So. 3d 1291 (In re Lenoir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.