In re Lenny V.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Lenny V.

247 A.D.2d 919, 668 N.Y.S.2d 535

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 4, 1998·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Based upon respondent’s history of antisocial behavior, truancy and inadequate parental supervision, Family Court properly exercised its discretion in determining that placement at a New York State Division for Youth facility was the “least restrictive available alternative” (Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]; see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947; Matter of Quentin L., 231 AD2d 890; Matter of Edward V., 204 AD2d 1060). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J. — Violation of Probation.)

Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Based upon respondent’s history of antisocial behavior, truancy and inadequate parental supervision, Family Court properly exercised its discretion in determining that placement at a New York State Division for Youth facility was the “least restrictive available alternative” (Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]; see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947; Matter of Quentin L., 231 AD2d 890; Matter of Edward V., 204 AD2d 1060). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J. — Violation of Probation.)

Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

In re Lenny V., 247 A.D.2d 919, 668 N.Y.S.2d 535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

247 A.D.2d 919 (In re Lenny V.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related