Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Lenny V.

In re Lenny V.

247 A.D.2d 919, 668 N.Y.S.2d 535
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 4, 1998
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished

This text of 247 A.D.2d 919 (In re Lenny V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Lenny V., 247 A.D.2d 919, 668 N.Y.S.2d 535 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Based upon respondent’s history of antisocial behavior, truancy and inadequate parental supervision, Family Court properly exercised its discretion in determining that placement at a New York State Division for Youth facility was the “least restrictive available alternative” (Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]; see, Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947; Matter of Quentin L., 231 AD2d 890; Matter of Edward V., 204 AD2d 1060). (Appeal from Order of Chautauqua County Family Court, Hartley, J. — Violation of Probation.)

Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Katherine W.
468 N.E.2d 28 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
In re Edward V.
204 A.D.2d 1060 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
In re Quentin L.
231 A.D.2d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D.2d 919, 668 N.Y.S.2d 535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lenny-v-nyappdiv-1998.