In re Lenny R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Lenny R.

262 A.D.2d 31, 689 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6164

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 3, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D.2d 31 (In re Lenny R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lenny R., 262 A.D.2d 31, 689 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6164 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about February 26, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of robbery in the second degree, and placed [32]*32him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations. Given these determinations, there was ample evidence of appellant’s participation in the robbery. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about February 26, 1998, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of robbery in the second degree, and placed [32]*32him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. We see no reason to disturb the court’s credibility determinations. Given these determinations, there was ample evidence of appellant’s participation in the robbery. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D.2d 31, 689 N.Y.S.2d 397, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lenny-r-nyappdiv-1999.