In Re Lendvest Mortgage, Inc., Debtor. (Two Cases) Charles E. Sims, Successor Chapter 11 Trustee for the Estate of Lendvest Mortgage, Inc. v. Alejandro Amador Ellen Amador, Charles E. Sims, Successor Chapter 11 Trustee for the Estate of Lendvest Mortgage, Inc. v. Angelo G. Sanchez Margaret A. Sanchez
This text of 15 F.3d 1086 (In Re Lendvest Mortgage, Inc., Debtor. (Two Cases) Charles E. Sims, Successor Chapter 11 Trustee for the Estate of Lendvest Mortgage, Inc. v. Alejandro Amador Ellen Amador, Charles E. Sims, Successor Chapter 11 Trustee for the Estate of Lendvest Mortgage, Inc. v. Angelo G. Sanchez Margaret A. Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
15 F.3d 1086
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re LENDVEST MORTGAGE, INC., Debtor. (Two Cases)
Charles E. SIMS, Successor Chapter 11 Trustee for the Estate
of Lendvest Mortgage, Inc., Appellant,
v.
Alejandro AMADOR; Ellen Amador, Appellees.
Charles E. SIMS, Successor Chapter 11 Trustee for the Estate
of Lendvest Mortgage, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Angelo G. SANCHEZ; Margaret A. Sanchez, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 92-15364, 92-16020.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 15, 1993 (No. 92-16020).
Submitted Dec. 15, 1993* (No. 92-15364).
Decided Jan. 4, 1994.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, GARTH** and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Debtor Lendvest Mortgage appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's (BAP) opinions which held that Lendvest does not possess an ownership interest in the notes and deeds of trust it was seeking to avoid. The BAP had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158(b)(1). We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158(d). We affirm for the reasons stated in the BAP's orders dated January 28, 1992, and May 15, 1992.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 F.3d 1086, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lendvest-mortgage-inc-debtor-two-cases-charles-e-sims-ca9-1994.