In re Lemseh A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Lemseh A.

204 A.D.2d 1040, 614 N.Y.S.2d 961

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 27, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject respondent’s contention that Family Court erred in permitting the examining psychiatrist to refer to a letter in respondent’s file. The letter was not received in evidence. Thus, the requirements for admissibility under the business records exception to the hearsay rule (see, CPLR 4518 [a]) do not apply. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Dillon, J.—Terminate Parental Rights.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject respondent’s contention that Family Court erred in permitting the examining psychiatrist to refer to a letter in respondent’s file. The letter was not received in evidence. Thus, the requirements for admissibility under the business records exception to the hearsay rule (see, CPLR 4518 [a]) do not apply. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Dillon, J.—Terminate Parental Rights.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

In re Lemseh A., 204 A.D.2d 1040, 614 N.Y.S.2d 961 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

204 A.D.2d 1040 (In re Lemseh A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.