In re Lemseh A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Lemseh A.

204 A.D.2d 1040, 614 N.Y.S.2d 961

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.2d 1040 (In re Lemseh A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lemseh A., 204 A.D.2d 1040, 614 N.Y.S.2d 961 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject respondent’s contention that Family Court erred in permitting the examining psychiatrist to refer to a letter in respondent’s file. The letter was not received in evidence. Thus, the requirements for admissibility under the business records exception to the hearsay rule (see, CPLR 4518 [a]) do not apply. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Dillon, J.—Terminate Parental Rights.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject respondent’s contention that Family Court erred in permitting the examining psychiatrist to refer to a letter in respondent’s file. The letter was not received in evidence. Thus, the requirements for admissibility under the business records exception to the hearsay rule (see, CPLR 4518 [a]) do not apply. (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Dillon, J.—Terminate Parental Rights.) Present—Green, J. P., Pine, Balio, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D.2d 1040, 614 N.Y.S.2d 961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lemseh-a-nyappdiv-1994.