In re Leland

S.D. New York

In re Leland

15 F. Cas. 290, 8 Ben. 204

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Leland. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 F. Cas. 280 →

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 15, 1875·Published

Opinion

BLATCHFOKD, District Judge.

I am of opinion that the deposition of Warren Leland is admissible in evidence against him, and that the deposition of Charles Leland is admissible in evidence against him, and that the decree is admissible in evidence against both of them; but that the deposition of Simeon Leland is not admissible in evidence against either of them. The exclusion of the question put to Pomeroy was proper. I see no reason why Mr. McMahon should not be sworn and examined. The ruling out of the papers in the case of Platt v. Holladay [supra], was proper.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLATCHFOKD, District Judge.

I am of opinion that the deposition of Warren Leland is admissible in evidence against him, and that the deposition of Charles Leland is admissible in evidence against him, and that the decree is admissible in evidence against both of them; but that the deposition of Simeon Leland is not admissible in evidence against either of them. The exclusion of the question put to Pomeroy was proper. I see no reason why Mr. McMahon should not be sworn and examined. The ruling out of the papers in the case of Platt v. Holladay [supra], was proper.

In re Leland, 15 F. Cas. 290, 8 Ben. 204 (S.D.N.Y. 1875).

Pincite

15 F. Cas. 290 (In re Leland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.