In Re Leis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

In Re Leis

821 A.2d 583, 573 Pa. 66, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 825

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 3, 2003·No. 146 DB 2002·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2003, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated March 14, 2003, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that CAROLE SHERMAN LEIS, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2003, The Report and Recommendations of The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania dated March 14, 2003, are approved and IT IS ORDERED that CAROLE SHERMAN LEIS, who has been on inactive status, has never been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for Reinstatement shall be paid by the Petitioner.

In Re Leis, 821 A.2d 583, 573 Pa. 66, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 825 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

821 A.2d 583 (In Re Leis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.