in Re: Lefleur Transportation of Texas, Inc., Lefleur Transportation Co. of Tupelo, Inc., and Aracelia Gonzalez Ibarra, Individually

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 5, 2006
Docket13-05-00787-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Lefleur Transportation of Texas, Inc., Lefleur Transportation Co. of Tupelo, Inc., and Aracelia Gonzalez Ibarra, Individually (in Re: Lefleur Transportation of Texas, Inc., Lefleur Transportation Co. of Tupelo, Inc., and Aracelia Gonzalez Ibarra, Individually) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Lefleur Transportation of Texas, Inc., Lefleur Transportation Co. of Tupelo, Inc., and Aracelia Gonzalez Ibarra, Individually, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-05-787-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE LEFLEUR TRANSPORTATION OF TEXAS, INC.,

LEFLEUR TRANSPORTATION CO. OF TUPELO, INC.,

AND ARACELIA GONZALEZ IBARRA, INDIVIDUALLY

                      On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

                     Before Justices Hinojosa, Ya_ez, and Castillo

                             Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion


Relators, Le Fleur Transportation of Texas, Inc., LeFleur Transportation Co. of Tupelo, Inc. and Aracelia Gonzalez Ibarra, Individually, filed a motion for emergency stay and petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on December 29, 2005. Having examined and fully considered the motion and petition for writ of mandamus, the Court is of the opinion that (1)  relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought and, thus, (2) the motion and petition must be denied.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).  Accordingly, the motion for emergency stay is DENIED and the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 5th day of January, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Lefleur Transportation of Texas, Inc., Lefleur Transportation Co. of Tupelo, Inc., and Aracelia Gonzalez Ibarra, Individually, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lefleur-transportation-of-texas-inc-lefleur--texapp-2006.