In re Lee

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Lee

645 S.E.2d 239, 373 S.C. 378, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 194

DecidedMay 4, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 645 S.E.2d 239 (In re Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Lee, 645 S.E.2d 239, 373 S.C. 378, 2007 S.C. LEXIS 194 (S.C. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On October 9, 2006, the Court suspended petitioner for a period of 180 days and required that the Committee on Character and Fitness (CCF) determine whether he had the requisite character and fitness to practice law in this State prior to his reinstatement. In the Matter of Lee, 370 S.C. 501, 636 S.E.2d 624 (2006).

On December 11, 2006, petitioner filed a Petition for Reinstatement and the matter was referred to the CCF. After conducting a hearing on the matter, the CCF submitted a Report and Recommendation in which it concluded that peti[379]*379tioner has the requisite character and fitness to practice law in this State. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) has not filed exceptions.

After thorough review and consideration of this matter, the Court grants the Petition for Reinstatement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JEAN H. TOAL, C.J., JAMES E. MOORE, E.C. BURNETT, III, COSTA M. PLEICONES, and WALLER, JJ., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI