in Re: Lee Roy Garcia v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 8, 2007
Docket12-07-00284-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Lee Roy Garcia v. State (in Re: Lee Roy Garcia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Lee Roy Garcia v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

                NO. 12-07-00283-CR

NO. 12-07-00284-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§         

IN RE: LEE ROY GARCIA,            §          ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

RELATOR


MEMORANDUM OPINION

            Lee Roy Garcia pleaded guilty to two felony offenses (trial court cause numbers 007-1276-02 and 007-1512-02).  He was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment in each case, with the sentences to be served consecutively.  In this original proceeding, Garcia alleges he was not given proper credit for his presentence jail time and that he filed a motion requesting a nunc pro tunc judgment, which the trial court denied.  He now seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to grant him proper jail time credit.

            When a trial court does not respond to a motion for a nunc pro tunc judgment alleging incorrect jail time credit, we may grant a writ of mandamus requiring the trial court to rule on the motion.  Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 149 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).  In cases such as this, when the trial court has ruled on the motion and denied it, filing an application for writ of habeas corpus in the court of criminal appeals, and not mandamus, is the appropriate avenue for relief.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon 2005) (establishes procedures for postconviction application for writ of habeas corpus in noncapital felony cases); Ex parte Deeringer, 210 S.W.3d 616, 617-18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).  Accordingly, we deny Garcia’s petition for writ of mandamus.

                                                                                                     SAM GRIFFITH   

                                                                                                             Justice

Opinion delivered August 8, 2007.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Ybarra
149 S.W.3d 147 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2004)
Ex Parte Deeringer
210 S.W.3d 616 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Lee Roy Garcia v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lee-roy-garcia-v-state-texapp-2007.