In re Lee P.

304 A.D.2d 760, 757 N.Y.S.2d 786, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4290
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 21, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 304 A.D.2d 760 (In re Lee P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Lee P., 304 A.D.2d 760, 757 N.Y.S.2d 786, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4290 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the grounds of permanent neglect and abandonment, the father appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper) of the Family Court, Kings County (Porzio, J.), dated June 26, 2000, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that he permanently neglected and abandoned the subject child, terminated his parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship [761]*761rights jointly to the petitioner and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly determined that there was clear and convincing evidence of the father’s abandonment of the child based on his failure to contact the child or communicate with the petitioner agency during the six-month period before the filing of the petition (see Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [b]; [5] [a]). The father did not establish that he was unable to contact either the child or the agency during that period (see Matter of Julius P., 63 NY2d 477 [1984]; Matter of St. Christopher-Ottillie v Troy Donnell M., 210 AD2d 233 [1994]; Matter of Trudell W., 119 AD2d 828 [1986]). In light of this determination, we need not address the issue of permanent neglect.

Furthermore, the Family Court properly determined that the child’s best interests would be served by terminating the father’s parental rights and freeing the child for adoption (see Family Ct Act §§ 623, 631; Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136 [1984]; Matter of Messiah Quwan D., 288 AD2d 383 [2001]; Matter of Desire Star H., 202 AD2d 582 [1994]). Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Tyshawn S. Suffolk County Department of Social Services
2016 NY Slip Op 7030 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
In re Andrew R.
21 A.D.3d 378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re Lamont Dale M. St. Vincent's Services, Inc.
11 A.D.3d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Annette B.
2 A.D.3d 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 A.D.2d 760, 757 N.Y.S.2d 786, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-lee-p-nyappdiv-2003.